Skip to content
← Back to the reading room
Family Secrets / 10 min read

The Man in the Cab

An exhibition photograph exposes a father’s role in a local demolition and the family story that kept him on the other side of the fence.

Afterglow · 1,902 words

In the photograph, my father stood behind the fence with his hands in his pockets while the old picture house came down. I had seen the image before. Everyone in our town had. What I had never noticed was the name on the jacket worn by the man driving the machine.

It was my father’s name.

The print lay beneath a desk lamp in the community archive. I was helping prepare a display about the high street, thirty years after the demolition. At forty-four, I had returned to the town with more professional confidence than I possessed when I left. I designed exhibition panels for a living. This was a favour to a volunteer group and, I thought, an uncomplicated opportunity to honour the place where I grew up.

My father had supplied the family version of the picture house story for as long as I could remember. The building was neglected, people protested, the owners sold, the machines arrived. He had been among those who wanted to save it. My mother had stood at the fence with me, both of us wearing badges. I was fourteen and certain that caring about something should make its loss impossible.

Now I leaned closer to the print. The man behind the fence was not my father. His face was partly obscured, his build similar enough for a child to accept an adult’s identification. The operator in the cab had my father’s profile, his bent left ear and a jacket from the firm where he had worked.

I asked the archivist, Gail, whether there were more photographs. She opened a folder. In the next frame, the operator had turned towards the camera. There was no question left to negotiate.

I went to my parents’ house that evening carrying a copy. My mother was making dinner. My father sat in his usual chair, reading a catalogue of garden sheds he had no intention of buying. He was seventy-two and still capable of making a room feel arranged around his opinions.

I put the picture on the table.

“Why did you tell us you were behind the fence?”

He looked at it, then at my mother. She closed the oven door more slowly than necessary.

“I didn’t tell you that,” he said.

“You pointed yourself out.”

“You might have assumed.”

I remembered his finger on a newspaper image. I remembered him saying there I am. My mother sat down.

“You did, Colin.”

He looked at her with the betrayed expression of someone discovering a witness in his own kitchen. Then he removed his glasses and placed them beside the photograph.

“I drove it,” he said. “I was working.”

The ordinary sentence made me angrier than a dramatic confession might have done. “You knew we were there.”

“Of course I knew.”

“You let me tell everyone you protested.”

He said nothing. My mother stared at the table. I had come expecting one secret and found the outline of another: she had known all along.

Dinner stayed in the oven while they explained. My father had supported keeping the building before it closed, but he had also worked for the contractor appointed to clear the site. When the assignment came, he did not refuse it. Work had been irregular that year. Their savings were thin. The job lasted weeks, not only the morning in the photograph.

“You could have told me,” I said.

“You were fourteen,” my father replied. “You thought we could keep it open by wanting it enough.”

“So you lied until I was forty-four?”

That stopped him. He had reached for an old explanation and discovered I no longer fitted inside it.

My mother said she had wanted to tell me after the newspaper appeared. My father was ashamed and asked her to leave it. Later, when I repeated the protest story at school and at home, they corrected nothing. The silence became easier to maintain than to end.

“Easier for you,” I said.

My mother nodded. “Yes.”

I left before dinner. Outside, the town looked offensively familiar. The picture house had become a supermarket, then a discount furniture shop. I had bought a mattress there without remembering the old screen. Now every brick seemed to require a verdict.

At home, I opened the draft exhibition panel. It described my father’s recollection as a local protester’s memory. I deleted the line. Then I sat with the blank space, wanting to replace one uncomplicated story with another in which I was the person who finally told the truth.

The next morning, Gail called about a caption. I told her I needed to verify part of my father’s account. She said there was no hurry that day. The display would be better for being accurate. Her calmness irritated me until I understood that she had not just discovered her family could edit its own past.

I returned to the archive and looked through the whole folder. There were letters supporting the building, letters describing its poor condition, photographs of the unused entrance and accounts from staff who had lost their jobs before anyone began protesting. The story was larger than a machine at a fence. People disagreed about what could be saved, who should pay and whether another use had ever been realistic. None of those arguments made my father’s lie necessary. They did make my childhood certainty an incomplete map.

I found a photograph of my mother and me wearing our badges. We stood beside a woman who had sold sweets in the foyer. I remembered her giving me a peppermint and explaining that she needed work wherever it was available. At fourteen, I had heard only the peppermint part.

Two days later, my father came to my flat. He brought no photograph, no documents to justify himself. He stood in the hall until I invited him in.

“Your mother said I was still talking as if the problem was you finding out,” he said.

I waited.

“I was ashamed of doing it. Then I was ashamed I’d lied. I let the first thing excuse the second.”

He sat on the edge of the sofa. I asked whether he believed the building should have been saved. He said he had wanted it saved. Wanting and believing it possible were different. He had also wanted a steady wage and had been relieved when the job came. He had never liked admitting both things could occupy the same man.

“I won’t put words in your mouth for the display,” I said. “But I can’t print the old version.”

He nodded. “I know.”

“And I need to be able to tell this accurately. At least the people who heard me tell it wrong.”

That was harder for him. He looked towards the window for a long time before saying yes. I was glad he agreed, but I did not want permission to become another way he controlled what had happened. I explained that his agreement mattered to our relationship, not to whether I was allowed to remember my own experience.

We talked for nearly an hour. He told me about other jobs that year, the uncertainty he and my mother had hidden from me, the colleagues whose wages depended on the same contract. I listened without trying to turn the operator in the cab into a secret hero. He had made a choice within circumstances I had not understood. Afterwards he had made another choice, to be praised for a position he had not taken.

The next week, I spoke to my mother alone. She said she had disliked being made responsible for preserving his pride but had also chosen to cooperate. She did not ask me to excuse her because married people made compromises. I appreciated that. We talked about the girl beside the fence and what she might have learned if someone had trusted her with an uncomfortable answer.

Before writing the final panel, I asked Gail to read my draft without knowing which parts had been hardest for me. She crossed out a sentence calling the demolition inevitable. The folder did not establish that, she said. Another sentence described the protesters as naive. It did not establish that either. I had swung so far from the childhood story that I was beginning to belittle the people who had stood beside me.

I rewrote both lines. The building had been demolished. People had opposed it. My father had operated the machine. Those facts could stand without my arranging them to make one person entirely right. I also kept the photograph of my mother and me. Our badges were real. Our disappointment had been real. Discovering my father’s role did not require me to erase the afternoon as though we had all secretly agreed with him.

When I showed my mother the layout, she touched the edge of our photograph. She remembered the woman with the peppermints and supplied her name. Gail checked it against another source before adding it. The small act of verification pleased me more than any dramatic new caption could have done. Someone who had been scenery in my family story had become a person with her own name again.

For the display, Gail and I chose several images rather than the single famous one. The captions named the people we could verify and left unknown faces unknown. My father’s photograph carried a plain description of the demolition and his role. Beside it was a short account, approved by him for quotation, saying he had wanted the building kept but accepted work clearing the site.

We did not include the family lie. It belonged in conversations with the people affected, not as an attraction beneath a glass frame. I corrected the story with my brother, two cousins and an old school friend who remembered me repeating it. My father spoke to them himself where he needed to. Nobody applauded. There were awkward silences, questions and, in my brother’s case, anger I could not soften on anyone’s behalf.

On the display’s opening afternoon, my parents arrived together. My father paused before the photograph. For a moment I feared he would turn away or demand a change. Instead he read the caption twice. My mother took his arm, then moved on to a picture of the old bakery.

An elderly visitor recognised the machine and said he had worked on a similar site. My father began talking to him. Their conversation concerned weather, noise and how slowly a wall could fall before it suddenly did. I listened from a little distance. He sounded like a man remembering work, which was one part of the truth and enough for that moment.

Later, we walked past the former picture house. The furniture shop was closed. Through the glass we could see a row of lamps and a sofa beneath a sale sign. My father asked whether I wanted to stop for something to eat. I said yes, although I was still angry and suspected I would be for some time.

At the café, my mother found a table. My father went to the counter and turned to ask what I wanted. I looked at him: the familiar shoulders, the bent ear, the man from the photograph and several other photographs I had not yet learned how to read. I told him my order. When he brought it back, he sat opposite me and waited while I asked another question.

✳   The end   ✳